rog
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by rog on Dec 22, 2018 10:57:42 GMT -5
The Dodgers showed yesterday they can certainly make a trade without Farhan or even a replacement for Farhan. With Andrew Friedman at the helm, that's not the least bit surprising of course.
The Dodgers traded Matt Kemp, Yasiel Puig and Alex Wood for the unfortunately named Homer Bailey and prospects. In doing so, the Dodgers saved about $16 million against this year's cap. With Harper said to be asking for $40 million per season for 10 years, $16 million in cap money could make a significant difference.
Meanwhile, Dodgers outfield prospects Alex Verduggo Andrew Toles move up the depth chart. The lefty-hitting Verdugo has had a hard time breaking into the Dodgers lineup, but he's ranked the #32 prospect in baseball.
There's irony here. This is just the type of deal that would benefit the Giants. The Dodgers get prospects, they get younger, and they cut their committed payroll in 2019 back below the level of the Giants.
The Dodgers may have been hoping that Hyun-Jin Ryu would decline their qualifying offer, saving them $18 million and gaining them a draft choice when Ryu signed elsewhere. Their calculated gamble resulted in their keeping the effective but injury-riddled southpaw and not getting the large salary savings that would have occurred had they lost Ryu. This deal effectively makes salary cuts similar to Ryu's contract total.
We don't even know if the Dodgers are courting Harper, but they positioned themselves in a better place from which to do so.
|
|
|
Post by klaiggeb on Dec 22, 2018 17:05:03 GMT -5
They also got some top prospects, but the funny part is, according to papers HERE, they plan to RELEASE Bailey!
Don't get that deal
LA gave up way too much for the prospects, then again, they freed up a ton of money
|
|
rog
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by rog on Dec 23, 2018 19:44:26 GMT -5
I think you explained the deal, Boly.
Bailey would have been no better than their #8 starter, so there is no strong reason to keep him. The Dodgers got prospects, but their primary objective may have been to free up salary. I did read though that because of the many lefty bats they have, they may be more interested in a righty bat or two than in Harper.
The Reds got some good players, and the Dodgers replenished their prospects and saved a bunch of money. As I mentioned, the Dodgers' deal was just the type of deal the Giants should make.
The Mariners are shedding salary and gaining prospects in an effort to rebuild quickly. That's what the Giants should do, but sadly the Giants don't have the tradeable players the Mariners had.
|
|