|
|
Post by allenreed on Feb 24, 2013 11:10:20 GMT -5
Yes, I know this is off topic, but I know there are a couple of W's fans here, and there's not a Warrior board that I'm aware of. Two questions. Are the Warriors bound for a fall, and do they play better with or without Bogut?
|
|
sfgdood
Long time member 
stats geeks never played the game...that's why they don't get it and never will
Posts: 90
|
Post by sfgdood on Feb 24, 2013 19:12:11 GMT -5
I think they will remain steady. They had a bit of a stumble just before the AS break but they seem to be rejuvinated now. They are not better without Bogut, but Andrew is not scoring the ball right now and until he does, the team will not reach its full potential. Once he starts making teams pay for staying with the 3 point shooters, the team will be extremely hard to defend. I'm disappointed with the back spasms. He needs to just keep racking up minutes to refine his scoring touch. No doubt the defense improves with Andrew in the lineup.
~Dood
|
|
|
|
Post by allenreed on Feb 24, 2013 20:26:34 GMT -5
Interesting take. I was discouraged with the losing streak. The team looked tired and lost alot of intensity on defense. The last two have been encouraging. They stole one today vs. Minnesota.
You'd think Bogut would help, but the W-L record sure doesn't show it. I don't think he was healthy when he came back. I'm not sure he ever will be.
|
|
|
|
Post by allenreed on Mar 26, 2013 10:47:52 GMT -5
Here's one for you, Rog. Wondering if you watched the W's-Lakers game last night, and what you're take on the officiating was. At least twice, Kobe actually chased a player, bumped into him, and that player was called for a foul. He did it once with Klay Thompson, and once with Bogut. Kobe shot 16 free throws, more than twice as many as any other player. Horribly biased officiating.
|
|
